Page 140 - IJET_July2021_final

does not have any influence on ELr However, their readiness in terms of
scores of faculty members and they their pedagogical practices and attitude
are technologically ready for eLearning. towards eLearning is very low.
Figure 6 (a): Box plot displaying the Designation wise ELr scores of Faculty
members; (b) Dimension wise readiness mean scores of faculty members
with respect to their designation

eLearning readiness no significant outliers in the ELr scores.
As high as 75percent of faculty members
The ELr score (all dimensions scores
added together) of faculty members scored above 210 and 25percent of
ranged from 157 to 293 (M = 228.11, SD them scored above 247.50 (vide table
= 25.42) and were normally distributed 1). From table 1, it can be concluded that
(vide figure 7 (a), (b), table 1), with the ELr score of the 95percent of the
skewness of .030 (SE = 0.119) and faculty members of higher education
kurtosis of -.346 (SE = 0.237). From institutions of Gandhinagar district will
figure 7 (a) it is also clear that there are lie between 304.394 and 151.826.
Table-1: Descriptive Statistics of ELr

Statistic Std. Error
eLearning Mean 228.11 1.239
Readiness 95% Confidence Lower Bound 225.67
Interval for Mean Upper Bound 230.54
5% Trimmed Mean 228.09
Median 227.00
Std. Deviation 25.428
Interquartile Range 38
Percentiles 25 210.00
50 227.00
75 247.50
Source: Research data

130 Indian Journal of Educational Technology
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021