Page 137 - IJET_July2021_final
P. 137

Figure 3 (a): Box plot displaying the ELr scores of Faculty members with
          respect to their teaching experience; (b) Dimension wise readiness mean
            scores of faculty members with respect to their teaching experience





















        Discipline and ELr dimensions           it is also clear that there are no obvious
                                                outliers  in  any  of  the  samples. The
        The sample for the study  constituted
        of  55  percent faculty  members from   result of one way ANOVA  (F (2, 418)  =
        Science  &  Technology  (M  =  230.28,  SD   1.969, p = .141) indicated that there was
        = 24.92), 37 percent of faculty members   no significant influence of Discipline on
        from Social Sciences (M = 225.10, SD =   ELr  scores.  Al  Gamdi  &  Samarji,  2016
        25.94) and 8 percent of faculty members   reported that there were not significant
        from  Arts  &  Humanities  (M  =  227.29,   differences even in the subscale scores
        SD = 25.68) discipline. Thus, the mean   among the faculty members belonging
        score  of  ELr  of  Science  &  Technology   to various disciplines.  While, Alsaghier
        faculty members is higher  than the     &  Nguyen,  2012  reported  that  the
        overall mean score of ELr (M = 228.11).   discipline to which the faculty members
        Further, figure 4 (a) and (b) respectively   belonged to had a strong influence on
        represent the Discipline wise score     their rating towards or against online
        of ELr of faculty  members and  the     teaching.  From  figure  4  (b),  it  is  clear
        discipline wise mean scores by them on   that  the  mean  score of  TR  of  faculty
        dimensions of ELr. The maximum score    members of all the three disciplines is
        of ELr of faculty members belonging to   greater than their mean scores on other
        Arts & Humanities discipline is less than   readiness dimensions i.e., PR, RR  and
        the maximum score of ELr of faculty     A. The faculty members of all the three
        members belonging  to Social Sciences   disciplines have scored the least mean
        and  Science  &  Technology  discipline   score in PR followed by their readiness
        (vide  figure  4(a)).  The  ELr  scores  of   score on  A. Thus,  the mean score of
        faculty  members belonging to Social    readiness of faculty members of all the
        Sciences  and  Science  &  Technology   three disciplines  is higher  in  their  TR
        disciplines  are more  symmetrically    followed by RR, A and PR. Thus, it can be
        distributed than the ELr scores of Arts   concluded that discipline does not have
        & Humanities faculty members. Further,   any  influence  on  ELr  scores  of  faculty

          Indian Journal of Educational Technology                               127
          Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142