Page 135 - IJET_July2021_final
P. 135

members. The  IQR  indicates  that  the  Taha,  2014;  Volery,  2000),  barriers
        variability of ELr scores is more among  towards eLearning (Al Gamdi & Samarji,
        male faculty  members than  in  female  2016; Lloyd, et al., 2012), technological
        faculty members and the median score  challenges  (Aldowah,  2017;  Goulãoak,
        of ELr of male faculty members is more  2013; O"Donnell, 1991). Fleming, Becker
        than that of female faculty members. It  &  Newton,  (2017)  claimed  that  there
        also shows that the ELr scores of both  is  significant  difference  in  the  virtual
        female and  male faculty  members are  learning  style  of  males and  females.
        symmetrically  distributed  and there  Alenezi,  2012;  Navani  &  Ansari,  2016
        are no obvious  outliers in any of the  claimed  that  gender  has  significant
        samples. The result of one way ANOVA  correlation with  regard to attitude
        ( F (1, 419) = 2.165, p = .142) indicated  towards eLearning. Further, from figure
        that  there  was  no  significant  influence  2  (b),  it can be  interpreted that both
        of  gender  on    ELr scores which  is  in  female and  male faculty  members are
        line  with  the  findings  of  many  studies  almost equal in terms of their TR. Both
        which stated that gender does not have  female and male faculty members scored
        any significant impact on ELr (Agboola,  least  in  terms  of  PR  followed  by  their
        2006;    Oketch  et.  al.,  2014;    Soydal  et.  least score in A dimension.  They both
        al.,  2011) perception towards eLearning  scored higher  on  RR when  compared
        (Mutiaradevi, 2009; Wong & Atan, 2007,)  to PR and A. Thus, it can be concluded
        and  the  present  finding  is  in  contrast  that gender does not have any influence
        to the findings of studies which stated  on ELr scores of faculty members and
        that gender differences were observed  they both are technologically ready for
        with  regard  to  perception  towards:  eLearning. However, their readiness in
        effectiveness/readiness  of  eLearning  terms of their pedagogical practices and
        (Islam,  2011;  So  &  Swatman,  2005;  attitude towards eLearning is very low.

        Figure-2 (a): Box plot displaying the ELr scores of Faculty members according
            to their gender; (b) Dimension wise readiness mean scores of faculty
                           members with respect to their gender


























          Indian Journal of Educational Technology                               125
          Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140