Page 43 - IJET_July2021_final

Table-3: Internal Consistency

Composite Cronbachs
Constructs AVE R Square
Reliability Alpha
Attitude 0.80 0.94 - 0.92
Intention 0.80 0.89 0.60 0.76
Motivation 0.63 0.77 - 0.44
Perception 0.72 0.91 - 0.87
Personality 0.76 0.86 - 0.72
Source: Primary Data

The scores of composite reliability for table-3 i.e. composite reliability column
each construct should be above 0.70 shows that the score of each construct
to confirm the presence of internal is above 0.70, therefore internal
consistency (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & consistency is present.
Sarstedt, 2016). The third column of
Table-4: Individual Indicator Reliability (Outer Loadings)

Attitude Intention Motivation Perception Personality

Attitude_1 0.89

Attitude_2 0.94
Attitude_3 0.85
Attitude_4 0.88
Intention_1 0.93

Intention_2 0.86
Motivation_1 0.68
Motivation_2 0.89
Perception_1 0.86

Perception_2 0.89
Perception_3 0.89
Perception_4 0.75
Personality_1 0.96

Personality_2 0.77
Source: Primary Data
In order to confirm individual indicator Sarstedt, 2016). Table-4 shows that
reliability, the scores of outer loadings the outer loading value of each scale
derived from algorithm outcome should item is above 0.60, therefore individual
be above 0.60 (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & indicator reliability is also present.

Indian Journal of Educational Technology 33
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021