Page 210 - IJET_July2021_final

Table-3: Multiple Comparisons: Tukey HSD Multiple comparison of classroom
in developing depth knowledge

(I) (J) Std. 95% Confidence
Programme Programme Mean Error Sig Level
Lower Upper
Bound Bound

II B.EdSpl.Ed -.27405 19835 .514 -.7930 .2449
I B.EdSpl.Ed I M.EdSpl.Ed -1.22000 .47527 .056 -2.4634 .0234
II M.EdSpl.Ed .44667 .39518 .672 -.5872 1.4805

I B.EdSpl.Ed .27405 19835 .514 -.2449 .7930
II B.EdSpl.Ed I M.EdSpl.Ed -.94595 .48142 .209 -2.2054 .3135
II M.EdSpl.Ed .72072 .40255 .284 -.3324 1.7738

I B.EdSpl.Ed 1.22000 .47527 .056 -.0234 2.4634
I M.EdSpl.Ed II B.EdSpl.Ed .94595 .48142 .209 -.3135 2.2054
II M.EdSpl.Ed 1.66667* .59041 .029 .1221 3.2112

I B.EdSpl.Ed -.44667 .39518 .672 -1.4805 .5872
II M.EdSpl.Ed II B.EdSpl.Ed -.72072 .40255 .284 -1.7738 .3324
I M.EdSpl.Ed -1.66667* .59041 .029 -3.2112 -.1221

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
The Tukey honestly significant that M.Ed Special Education I year
difference (HSD) test was performed students develop in-depth knowledge
under the significant result of ANOVA in about a content through online mode
developing in depth knowledge about a of teaching when compared to M.Ed
content through online classroom and Special Education II year and B.Ed
regular classroom among students of Special Education I year students.
B.Ed Special Education I and II year and In the study conducted by (Abdelrahman
M.Ed Special Education I and II year. Mohamed Ahmed, 2020) it is
Multiple comparison results presented established that ICTs prepare learners
significant statistical differences for the future and trains them to meet
among students pursuing M.Ed Special the technological advances of the 21st
Education I year when compared to century. Moreover, ICTs positively
all other categories of students. The change how activities are prepared and
mean difference of M.Ed Special introduced in teaching and learning,
Education I year students is significant which can significantly change the
(P = 0.05, P < 0.05)when compared to overall academic performance of the
B.Ed Special Education I year and M.Ed student teachers. This lines up with
Special Education II year respectively. the response to the above question
Hence it can be specifically inferred
that master educators (M.Ed Special
200 Indian Journal of Educational Technology
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021