Page 215 - IJET_July2021_final
P. 215

Research Article

          Effect of EduSat Lectures on Scientific Creativity among High
                              School Students in Haryana


                                Sandeep Berwal,  Ritu Ahlawat &  Suman Chaudhari
                          1
                                                        3
                                          2
         1 Professor, Department of Education, Chaudhary Ranbir Singh University, Jind, Harya-
                           na, India, Email: berwal_suhani@yahoo.com
              2 Assistant Professor, G.V.M., College of Education, Sonipat. Haryana, India
        3 Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Education, Chaudhary Ranbir Singh University,
                                      Jind, Haryana, India

                                          Abstract

        The study attempted to explore the effect of technology-based teaching on improving
        the scientific creativity of high school students in Haryana. The sample comprised 200
        class IX students studying in four government schools of the Sonipat district. This was
        an experimental study using a pre-test/post-test equivalent group design in which the
        control and experimental group were equated on socio-economic status and intelligence
        levels. The Verbal Test of Scientific Creativity by Sharma and Shukla was administered
        at the pre-and-post treatment phase. The results reveal that technology-based EduSat
        lectures were not more effective than the normal classroom teaching in enhancing the
        scientific creativity of high school students. It is suggested that while developing EduSat
        lectures immense power of multimedia should be utilized to stimulate divergent thinking
        of students. The study has implications for policymakers, media personnel, teachers,
        students, parents and experts involved in the EduSat lecture delivery system.
        Keywords: Effect, EduSat, Scientific Creativity, High School, Haryana

        Introduction                            those who contribute something original
                                                and valuable to society and culture.
        Scientific  creativity  has  been  defined
                                                Guilford  (1950),  a major contributor  in
        by  researchers  in  different  manners   the field of creativity research, described
        and  contexts.  Besemer  and  Treffinger   “creativity as being  grounded  in  the
        (1981)  stated that novelty, resolution,   ability  to  manipulate  ideas  in  fluent,
        elaboration, and synthesis are the      flexible,  elaborate,  and  original  ways”.
        distinguishing  features  of  scientific   His  views  are supported  by  Torrance
        creativity.  Mansfield  and  Busse  (1981),   (1967)  maintaining  that creativity is
        based on their review of literature,    exogenous  and transferable in  mental
        have identified five basic ingredients of   manipulations  while  Sternberg (1988)
        a  creative  act:  problem  selection,  best   linked  creativity with  the development
        efforts  for  problem  solution,  dealing   of  insight.  According  to  Shively  (2011),
        effectively  with  restrictions,  facing   the four key abilities closely associated
        varying  obstacles, and  authenticating   with  the  creative  process  are  fluency,
        and extending  the work. Ochse (1990)   flexibility,  originality,  and  elaboration.
        conceptualized  creative  persons  as
          Indian Journal of Educational Technology                               205
          Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220