Page 78 - IJET_July2021_final
P. 78

Table-8: Summary of Kruskal Wallis H Test for Mean Rank Readiness
            Scores of rural, urban and semi urban participants towards Blended
                                     Learning Approach


                                           Ranks
                           Locale            N     Mean Rank      Sig.    Remark
          Readiness        Rural            224      248.66      0.765      Not
          Scores towards                                                 Significant
          blended learning   Urban          213      240.36
          approach         Semi urban        53      252.82
                           Total            490

        It is evident from the above columnar that  have similar readiness towards using a
        both the three groups can be considered  blended learning approach for teachers’
        uniform because of excess similarity in  preparation.
        the distribution of dependent variable
        in both the three groups. Therefore, it  Readiness of Teacher Educators,
        can be undoubtedly  said that p- value  Research Scholars and Pupil Teachers
        obtained from the Kruskal Wallis H Test  towards using blended  learning
        is  reliable,  further it  is  evident  from  approach for teachers’ preparation
        the table that the test statistics of the   The  fourth objective of the present
        readiness scores of rural, urban  and   research was to compare readiness of
        semi urban  participants  is  K=  0.536   Teacher Educators, Research  Scholars
        whose  probability  of  significance  is   and  Pupil  Teachers towards using
        0.765 which is more than 0.05, hence not   a blended  learning approach. For
        significant  at  0.05  level  of  significance,   this,  490  participants  (106  Teacher
        therefore the null hypothesis “There is   Educators, 105 Research  Scholars and
        no  significant  difference  in  mean  rank   279  Pupil  Teachers) associated  with
        of readiness scores of rural, urban     teacher education were selected using
        and  semi urban  participants” is  not   convenient sampling techniques. Since,
        rejected, It  is clear from the  above   in this objective we were comparing
        figure that the mean rank of readiness   three groups so it was suggested to
        scores of  rural participants  is  248.66   use ANOVA  for the analysis of data.
        which  is similar to that of urban  and   But  before  using  ANOVA,  the  first
        semi urban participants whose mean      assumption of normality of scores of
        rank of readiness scores is 240.36 and   dependent  variables for  each  level  of
        252.82. Hence, it can be said that rural,   independent variable was tested.
        urban  and  semi urban  participants









         68                                         Indian Journal of Educational Technology
                                                              Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83