Page 284 - IJET_July2021_final
P. 284

*at 0.05 level of significance    Online Learning, Fishbowl strategy was
        Calculated t-value < Critical value of t at  found to be equally effective in terms of
        0.05 level of significance.             academic achievement.
        Thus, the null hypothesis is retained.  Along  with  the  significant  increase  in
                                                the achievement, Fishbowl strategy
        The two-tailed P value equals 0.0909.
                                                helps  enhance higher  order thinking
        By conventional criteria, this difference   and other cognitive  abilities of the
        is not statistically significant.       learners. It  allowed  participants  to
        There is no significant difference between   interact with  each other, understand
        post-test  scores of  the  participants   different  perspectives  and  analyse
        participating through Fishbowl strategy   group  discussion  before precisely
        in Sync mode and Async mode of online   expressing their own view points.
        learning.  Therefore, Fishbowl  strategy   They were engaged  in interactions
        was  found  to  be  equally  effective  in   and  negotiations,  even  in  an  online
        both Sync mode and Async mode of        environment. The joy and satisfaction
        Online  Learning in  terms of Academic   of learning  on your own  and  learning
        Achievement.                            together could be created by these
                                                activities.
        Conclusion                              It is suggested  that more cooperative
        Fishbowl strategy was found  to be      learning  strategies  can  be  tested
        effective in Online Learning. This strategy   in  online  learning  environments  in
        can be implemented effectively in both   synchronous  as well  as asynchronous
        Synchronous  and  Asynchronous  Mode    environments.   Qualitative  analysis
        of Online Learning in order to improve   of  the  user-generated  data   can
        academic achievement  of  learners.     further  be  analysed  to  understand
        When  compared  for  effectiveness  in   patterns of knowledge  generation and
        Synchronous vs Asynchronous Mode of     learner dynamics in Online Learning
        Environment.
                                         Reference

        Agarwal, R., & Nagar, N. (2011). Cooperative Learning (pp. 11-40, 143-162). Delhi:
               Kalpaz Publications.

        Best_Schools. (2020,  September 03). Synchronous  Learning vs. Asynchronous
               Learning. https://thebestschools.org/magazine/synchronous-vs-
               asynchronous-education/#:~:text=Synchronous  learning  is  online  or,
               asynchronous and synchronous online learning.

        Creating a 21st  Century  Learning  Environment  Through  Cooperative Learning.
               (2018,    August  09).  Retrieved  August  25,  2020,  from  https://www.rite.
               education/2017/07/23/creating-a-21st-century-learning-environment-
               through-cooperative-learning/#:~:text=Creating  a  21st  Century  Learning
               Environment Through Cooperative Learning,-July 23, 2017&text=Structured
               cooperative learning  provides opportunities for technology  or
         274                                        Indian Journal of Educational Technology
                                                              Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289