Page 283 - IJET_July2021_final

mode of online learning
Table-3: Calculation of t-ratio of Pre-test and Post-test scores for Fishbowl
Strategy in Asynchronous Mode
Critical
Mean SD SEM N SED t-Value
Value

Pre-test scores 5.05 1.58 0.26 38
0.322 2.71* 4.0041
Post-test scores 6.34 1.19 0.19 38

*at 0.01 level of significance The third objective of the research
Calculated t-value > Critical value of t at was ‘To compare effectiveness of
0.01 level of significance. Fishbowl strategy in Synchronous vs.

Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected. Asynchronous mode of Online Learning
The two-tailed P value equals 0.0003. in terms of Academic Achievement’.
By conventional criteria, this difference The corresponding null hypothesis
is statistically significant. “There will be no significant difference
between post-test scores of the
The result of t-test indicates that there is
significant difference between pre-test participants for Fishbowl strategy in
and post-test scores of the participants Synchronous mode and Asynchronous
participating in Fishbowl Strategy in mode of online learning” was tested by
asynchronous mode of Online Learning calculating t-ratio.
in favour of post test scores. Table-4 depicts calculation of t-ratio of
Post-test scores for Fishbowl Strategy in
Objective 3:
Synchronous Vs Asynchronous mode of
online learning.
Table-4: Calculation of t-ratio of Post-test scores for Fishbowl Strategy
Critical
Mean SD SEM SED N t-Value
Value
Fishbowl Sync
Mode 6.34 1.19 0.19 36
0.281 2.000* 1.7137
Fishbowl Async
Mode 5.86 1.22 0.20 38

Indian Journal of Educational Technology 273
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021