Page 282 - IJET_July2021_final

Synchronous Vs Asynchronous mode of The corresponding null hypothesis
online learning. “There will be no significant difference
between pre-test and post-test scores of
The result and corresponding discussion
are given below: the participants for Fishbowl Strategy in
Synchronous mode of Online Learning”
Objective 1: was tested by calculating t-ratio.
The objective of the research was ‘To Table-2 depicts calculation of t-ratio
test effectiveness of Fishbowl Strategy in
Synchronous mode of Online Learning of Pre-test and Post-test scores for
in terms of Academic Achievement’. Fishbowl Strategy in Synchronous mode
of online learning.

Table-2: Calculation of t-ratio of Pre-test and Post-test scores for Fishbowl
Strategy in Synchronous Mode

Critical
Mean SD SEM N SED t-Value
Value

Pre-test scores 5.22 1.69 0.28 36
0.293 2.03* 2.1791
Post-test scores 5.86 1.22 0.20 36

*at 0.05 level of significance
Calculated t-value > Critical value of t at Objective 2:
0.05 level of significance.
The objective of the research was ‘To
Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.
test effectiveness of Fishbowl Strategy in
The two-tailed P value equals 0.0361 Asynchronous mode of Online Learning

By conventional criteria, this difference in terms of Academic Achievement’.
is statistically significant. The corresponding null hypothesis

The result of the t-test indicates that “There will be no significant difference
there is a significant difference between between pre-test and post-test scores of
pre-test and post-test scores of the the participants for Fishbowl Strategy in
participants participating in Fishbowl Asynchronous mode of Online Learning”
Strategy in synchronous mode of Online was tested by calculating t-ratio.
Learning in favour of post test scores. Table-3 depicts calculation of t-ratio
of Pre-test and Post-test scores for

Fishbowl Strategy in Asynchronous

272 Indian Journal of Educational Technology
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021