Page 225 - IJET_July2021_final
P. 225

It can, therefore, be concluded that both  and  control  group  students”,  is  thus
        the methods seem to be equally good  accepted. The analysis leads to the
        in enhancing overall scientific creativity  conclusion that EduSat lectures were
        and  the  effect  of  EduSat  lectures  was  not  more  effective  than  the  normal
        not at all visible when compared to the  classroom teaching  in  enhancing  the
        conventional method. Based on results  scientific  creativity  of  high  school
        obtained from the analysis of the data,  students.  Further, the  post-test  scores
        the  second  null  hypothesis  i.e.  “After  of both groups were analyzed on various
        the exposure to EduSat lectures, there  dimensions  of  scientific  creativity  and
        is  no  significant  difference  between  presented in Table-5.
        the scientific creativity of experimental
         Table-5: Difference in the Mean Score of Control and Experimental Group on
                    different Dimensions of Scientific Creativity Post-test
         Dimensions                                               ‘t’     Level of
         Scientific     Test       Group       N   Mean    S.D  value Significance
         Creativity
                                Experimental 100   20.02   4.90             Not
         Fluency                                                 0.98   significant at
                                Control       100  19.71   5.09
                                                                         0.05 level
                                Experimental 100   14.92   4.36             Not
         Flexibility   Pre-test                                  0.22   significant at
                                Control       100  14.99   4.42
                                                                         0.05 level
                                Experimental 100   12.30   6.36             Not
         Originality                                             0.91   significant at
                                Control       100  12.62   5.88
                                                                         0.05 level
        Table-5 shows the dimension-wise  lectures  were  not  more  effective  than
        effect of enhancing scientific creativity.  the  normal classroom teaching  in
        The calculated ‘t’ values are 0.98, 0.22,  increasing  the  scientific  creativity  of
        and 0.91 for different dimensions of the  high school students. In the absence of
        scientific  creativity  test.  Based  on  the  direct empirical research studies on the
        difference in mean scores on different  effect  of  EduSat  lectures  on  scientific
        dimensions  of  the  scientific  creativity  creativity, the present findings seem in
        test, it  can  be  inferred  that  students  agreement with the studies conducted
        of the experimental group and control  on the effect of television on creativity.
        group  had  shown  an  almost equal  The study by Runco and Pezdek (1984)
        increase. It can be concluded that EduSat  falls completely in line with the findings
        lectures and traditional methods  were  of the present study as they argued that
        equally effective in increasing all three  the  effect  of  watching  television  and
        dimensions of scientific creative ability.   listening radio on children's creativity is
                                                not different. Another study conducted
        Discussion and Conclusion               by Keyne (2003) showed that television
        The results indicate  that EduSat  viewers with large screen time scored

          Indian Journal of Educational Technology                               215
          Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230