Page 18 - IJET_July2021_final

Kumar, D. D. and Altschuld, J. W. (2003). The need for comprehensive evaluation in science
education. In Kumar, D. D. and Altschuld, J. W. (eds.), Science education policy: A
symposium. The Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 561-645.
Kumar, D. D. and Altschuld, J. W. (1999). Evaluation of interactive media in science education.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 55-65.
Lazaro, H. (2020). What is edtech and why should it matter to you? General Assembly Blog.
Retrieved March 9, 2021 from https://generalassemb.ly/blog/what-is-edtech/.

Odden, A. (1990). Educational indicators in the United States: The need for analysis.
Educational Researcher, 19(5), 24-29.

Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., and Oakes, J. (eds.). Indicators for monitoring mathematics
and science education. (ISBN-13: 978-0833009722; ISBN-10: 0833009729). Santa
Monica, CA: Rand.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus,
M. Scriven, and D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 117-141). (ISBN-10:
0898381320; ISBN-13: 978-0898381320). New York, NY: Springer.

Stufflebeam, D. J. and Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and applications
(ISBN-13: 978-0787977658; ISBN-10: 1118870328). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tata Trusts. (2019). Technology in education. India: Author. Retrieved March 9, 2021
from https://www.tatatrusts.org/our-work/education/deepening-learning/
technology-in-education.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the
connection, OTA-HER-616. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Retrieved March 9, 2021 from https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1995/9541/
9541.PDF

Weiss, C. H. (1997). Evaluation, second edition. (ISBN-13: 978-0133097252; ISBN-10:
0133097250). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weiss, C. H. (1993). Politics and evaluation: A reprise with mellower overtones. Evaluation
Practice, 14(1), 107-109.

8 Indian Journal of Educational Technology
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021