Page 18 - IJET_July2021_final
P. 18
Kumar, D. D. and Altschuld, J. W. (2003). The need for comprehensive evaluation in science
education. In Kumar, D. D. and Altschuld, J. W. (eds.), Science education policy: A
symposium. The Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 561-645.
Kumar, D. D. and Altschuld, J. W. (1999). Evaluation of interactive media in science education.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 55-65.
Lazaro, H. (2020). What is edtech and why should it matter to you? General Assembly Blog.
Retrieved March 9, 2021 from https://generalassemb.ly/blog/what-is-edtech/.
Odden, A. (1990). Educational indicators in the United States: The need for analysis.
Educational Researcher, 19(5), 24-29.
Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L. M., and Oakes, J. (eds.). Indicators for monitoring mathematics
and science education. (ISBN-13: 978-0833009722; ISBN-10: 0833009729). Santa
Monica, CA: Rand.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus,
M. Scriven, and D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 117-141). (ISBN-10:
0898381320; ISBN-13: 978-0898381320). New York, NY: Springer.
Stufflebeam, D. J. and Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and applications
(ISBN-13: 978-0787977658; ISBN-10: 1118870328). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tata Trusts. (2019). Technology in education. India: Author. Retrieved March 9, 2021
from https://www.tatatrusts.org/our-work/education/deepening-learning/
technology-in-education.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the
connection, OTA-HER-616. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Retrieved March 9, 2021 from https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk1/1995/9541/
9541.PDF
Weiss, C. H. (1997). Evaluation, second edition. (ISBN-13: 978-0133097252; ISBN-10:
0133097250). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weiss, C. H. (1993). Politics and evaluation: A reprise with mellower overtones. Evaluation
Practice, 14(1), 107-109.
8 Indian Journal of Educational Technology
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021