Page 17 - IJET_July2021_final

Therefore, a compelling need for social studies, mathematics, and
developing comprehensive program computer science, and conceptualizing
evaluation models quite suitable for and developing models for individual
context-specific educational technology educational technology situations has
applications will continue to exist merit, and program evaluation for
as education reform becomes more educational technology remains a fertile
innovative with the development field for research and development.
of newer technologies. Rethinking (Acknowledgments: Editorial assistance
existing program evaluation models provided by Jessica McNair, Florida Atlantic
for educational technology in teaching University is thankfully acknowledged.)
and learning in science, languages,
References

Altschuld, J. W. and Kumar, D. D. (2010). Needs assessment: An overview. (ISBN-13: 978-
1412975841; ISBN-10: 1412975840). CA: Sage Publications.

Altschuld, J. W. and Kumar, D. D. (eds.) (2002). Evaluation of science and technology
education at the dawn of a new millennium. mill ennium (ISBN-13: 978-0306467493;
ISBN-10: 0306467496). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Altschuld, J. W., Kumar, D. D., Smith, W. D., and Goodway, J. D. (1999). The changing
countenance of context-sensitive evaluations: Case illustrations. Family and
Community Health, 22(1), 66-79.

Altschuld, J. W. and Kumar, D. D. (1995). Program evaluation in science education: The model
perspective. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 65, 5-17.
Barron, L. C., Joesten, M. D., Goldman, E. S., Hofwolt, C. A., Bibring, J. B., Holladay, W. G.,
and Sherwood, R. D. (1993). Improving science education: A collaborative approach
to the preparation of elementary school teachers. A final report to the National
Science Foundation under grant number TPE-8950310. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt
University.

CDC Program Evaluation. (2018). https://www.cdc.gov/eval/index.htm. (Retrieved 3-9- 2021)
Exline, J. D. and Tonelson, S. W. (1987). Virginia’s program assessment model resource
guide. National Science Teachers Association Science Education Suppliers.
Field, S. L. and Hill, D. D. (1988). Contextual appraisal: A framework for meaningful evaluation
of special education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 9(4), 22-30.

Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Re-examining categories of computer-based learning
in mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
Education [Online serial], 3(3). 275-287. https://citejournal.org/issue-3-03/volume-3/
mathematics/re-examining-categories-of-computer-based-learning-in-
mathematics-education (Retrieved 3-9-2021)
International Society for Technology in Education. (2021). ISTE standards.standards.
Portland, OR: Author. Retrieved March 9, 2021 from https://www.iste.org/standards.

Indian Journal of Educational Technology 7
Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2021